Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enverus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Enverus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company and still not matching with the requirements of WP:GNG. I see some references are bare urls. Abishe (talk) 07:10, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 07:10, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 07:10, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 07:10, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 07:10, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:35, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This reads almost like a press release - although I would expect more meaningful content from a press release. Even after reading it, I have no idea what they do. And yes, our family was in the oil business. If someone wants to re-write it, perhaps they might like to take a look at other oil-field service company entries, like Schlumberger or others in List of oilfield service companies? Tangurena (talk) 14:51, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this company has no significant coverage (entirely listings or local news), and does not inherit notability automatically from its client list. Having written most of the energy law articles on English Wikipedia, I have no idea what this company does and had never heard of it. They have seven followers on LinkedIn. I have one shared connection with one of their 750 or so employees. Bearian (talk) 16:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I have undone my closure of this discussion and relisted per a request on my talk page to enable further arguments to be put forward. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺13:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete wen't through all the references ,they hardly seem independent of the subjectGeorgiamarlins (talk) 20:10, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.