Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epsilon radiation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Delta ray. (non-admin closure) CThomas³ (talk) 10:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Epsilon radiation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOT#DICT - the one ref is just a definition, and several searches for this term yielded only a few mentions that were also trivial or definitions in a glossary. Given the lack of coverage, there doesn't seem to be enough material for a standalone article. ComplexRational (talk) 18:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ComplexRational (talk) 18:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per WP:CHEAP to Delta ray and fix all the double-redirects. Bearian (talk) 19:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - little to be said more than a dictionary definition and naming who coined it, but as Bearian says, redirects are cheap. Agricolae (talk) 18:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.