Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era mio fratello

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Era mio fratello

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, 2 episodes only. fails WP:GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (media) Flat Out let's discuss it 02:58, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: From what I can figure out so far, it looks like it was a 2 episode miniseries event. No status on notability, but it looks like this was only planned for 2 episodes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked for some help from WP:ITALY with looking for sources, as I'm not overly familiar with Italian language papers and the like. So far I've found this journal, which is published through Maney Publishing, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:21, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per this link, the journal is peer-reviewed, so it's definitely a step in the right direction. I'm putting various links down at the bottom in the EL section, if anyone wants to take a look at them. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:26, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per sources provided by me and by Tokyogirl79, article was unsourced but not unsourcable. As mentioned above, it was a 2-parts television film, which is way different from being a longer TV-series which is canceled after two episodes. --Cavarrone 07:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 03:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The sources added since it was nominated are enough to demonstrate a moderate level of notability; La Repubblica is a thoroughly reputable paper. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:09, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the sources added appear to reach WP:GNG --j⚛e decker ^talk 23:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.