Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ErectaStep
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
ErectaStep
- ErectaStep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable corporation. i don't see it meeting WP:CORP. cited references are not independent of the subject while the rest are not RS. Saqib (talk) 13:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: All sources are press releases, and passing mentions failing CORPDEPTH. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 14:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article on one of the brands of a non-notable company, SixAxis LLC. The available sources are WP:RUNOFTHEMILL: routine product announcements, finalist in a non-notable industry award, participation in an industry show. I am not seeing the in-depth coverage needed for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 07:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.