Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erica Ellyson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:38, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Erica Ellyson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT: None of the references currently in the article constitute significant coverage in reliable, external sources. I looked for new ones and found only a plot summary of a reality show[1], a paragraph in a Houston Press gossip column[2], and some tabloid dating rumours. Cheers, gnu 57 14:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 14:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 14:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 14:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 14:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hangover from the salad days of WP:PORNBIO; but now that's gone, this article fails the basic requirements of WP:ANYBIO, with insufficient coverage in third-party, independent reliable sources. ——SN 54129 11:14, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we have come to realize that one pornographic magazine giving a rotating monthly designation to someone is not a show of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.