Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Marcus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Marcus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:BIO and WP:GNG and sounds overly promotional of the subject. Of the 6 citations, most of the citations provided are not independent of the page subject (1, 2, 3, 4) and all are not from a reliable source (including 6, a youtube interview). My searches turned up nothing better that could improve the article. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks sources to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as my searches only found several links here and there at Books, News, browsers and Highbeam, but nothing for a noticeably better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 21:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.