Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernestas Veliulis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ernestas Veliulis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. JTtheOG (talk) 02:34, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 04:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 04:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 04:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 19:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - plays for club in semi-pro league, no full international, only source from Transfermarkt. No exceptional achievements to pass WP:GNG. '''tAD''' (talk) 20:07, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - here's one good newspaper article about him 1; if someone can find a second, he'd meet WP:GNG. And if not we'll likely recreate soon, as he was called up to the national team for their last international Euro qualifier. Nfitz (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.