Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethical Hackers Club
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Ethical Hackers Club
- Ethical Hackers Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Found no notability for this organisation. The references provided are just about either hacking or a passing by reference by users which are in no way credible. Most of the references even don't say anything about this firm. Lakun.patra (talk) 15:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 15:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 15:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and failure of WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Ajf773 (talk) 17:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - fails GNG as already stated; the article is promotional in its nature and intent Spiderone 09:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Promotional and lack of Gen Notability (SPOI (talk) 07:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC))
- Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.