Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eunice Wu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is clear that this subject does not meet the notability guidelines. As for redirecting/merging, there is no target to merge to and the current article does not mention the film in any detail worth creating a stand-alone article from. If and when an article about the film is created, this can be recreated as a redirect. And if someone really needs the text to create such an article about the film, I'm willing to provide a copy for this purposes if asked. Regards SoWhy 12:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eunice Wu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film maker. No mentions in press, search pulls up non RS primaries, fails GNG and all 4 criterion of WP:NFILMMAKER L3X1 (distant write) 16:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to figure out whether it could redirect to some article regarding California Proposition 8 (2008) or Post-election events of Proposition 8 (2008) but it is not mentioned in any of the articles. Same with film festivals. If it won some film festival award maybe it could redirect there? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:13, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:13, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to The Best Is Yet To Come (2010 film) as the film itself passes WP:NFILM having per http://ideas.org.tw/magazine_article.php?f=408 "來自台灣的Eunice Wu所執導女同志電影《The Best Is Yet To Come》即入圍了全球22個電影獎的獎項。been shown at 22 festivals and received press coverage, but the director appears to have not made anything notable since, and the benchmark for a BLP article is higher than for a film. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. WP:TOOSOON at best. Not sure if there is anything that could be rescued by merging into the non-yet existing article on the movie. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete does not pass the notability guidelines for filmmakers, not enough sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:53, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and move, per User:In ictu oculi's reasonable suggestion. This leaves a redirect behind. --doncram 21:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename and keep, per WP:Preserve Siuenti (씨유엔티) 22:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Googling the film yields nothing but self-published results/PR releases. Which are the 22 film festivals? I highly doubt any of them is notable. Timmyshin (talk) 17:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The best may be yet to come, but it isn't here yet. One short film without any awards claimed doesn't satisfy WP:CREATIVE by a wide margin. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as this individual clearly doesn't meet either WP:GNG or WP:NCREATIVE. The suggestion to create an article about the film and then redirect there would be a good one, if the film itself were notable, but I see no evidence of that either. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.