Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evertiq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. WP:A7/WP:G11 by Sjb72. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Evertiq

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization. No significant coverage to be found. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Evertiq has been publishing news for the electronics industry for the past 18 years. Several Wikipedia articles are referring to Evertiq. It's prudent that it has it's own Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrik Bjorsell (talk • contribs) 07:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Henrik Bjorsell (talk • contribs) appears to have a close connection with the subject of the article being discussed. [reply]

Delete I don't think there's any coverage besides the ones from Evertiq. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 22:51, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as A7 / G11 (why are even having this discussion)? K.e.coffman (talk) 03:10, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as WP:A7 and WP:G11 per K.e.coffman. No independent sources, article written by/deletion contested by the company owner with an undeclared conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 08:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.