Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everwise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Everwise

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory like listing on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't even come close, agree with nom, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or an internet Yellow Pages. HighKing⁺⁺20:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG upcoming at best a case of WP:TOOSOON.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.