Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everyzing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The first "keep" is qualified as weak, and the second does not address the sourcing issue.  Sandstein  19:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Everyzing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Longtime advertorial company article for which my searches are not finding better at all and examining these sources found some better sources than others, for example: Fortune, CNET and USA Today, but there's nothing actually convincing as those articles are not actually in-depth and solid, the USA Today in fact only has a few sentences and the other articles said before are also basically only mentioning the company in part alongside with Google, so there's certainly not inheritable notability. What's also is my searches have basically found nothing including recently so it frankly seems they must not be as active, if that ever happened, at this time considering the article's basic floating state since then (July 2007). SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:Notability is not inherited.—azuki (talk · contribs · email) 04:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep Hmm... there is an article on them on SearchEngine land, which is a highly reputable site for Search engine tech. http://searchengineland.com/a-closer-look-at-everyzing-13849 Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The company is still in business, but is now known as "Ramp Inc" (www.ramp.com). Their main product is a tool for making video presentations searchable and sharable. The article is badly in need of an update / redirect, but the company seems to be notable on an ongoing basis. JerryRussell (talk) 16:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.