Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil Minded (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Edguy#Discography. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evil Minded (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable demo. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first demo album by Edguy. I have seen that this article had an AfD back in 2010 and the result was delete because demos are not notable for WP and no reliable sources are available. The article was then re-created in 2012, it also has a notability tag since that year. Still no reliable sources, only the same old, standard unreliable sites like databases, download sites, lyrics sites, blogs, Youtube videos and forums. If there is a review, they are featured on unreliable sites like Metal Archives, Metal Music Archives and Rate Your Music. No reliable sources whatsoever. I have also nominated their second demo, Children of Steel which suffers from the same problems. Like I said at that demo's AfD, Edguy is a notable band but not everything they release is notable (that goes to any band btw). GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Edguy#Discography, looks more like a database entry than an actual encyclopedic article, not to mention that the only source is unreliable. Btw, both demos could have been jointly nominated, since the reasoning is the same and the topics are closely connected. Victor Lopes ^Fala!•C 21:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.