Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exercise Indus Shield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exercise Indus Shield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this meets NEVENTCRITERIA. There are several issues. I don’t see evidence of WP:LASTING impact, or even WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability and WP is not a newspaper. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Military, and Aviation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - There's a WP:DIVERSE coverage of the exercise and it passes WP:NEVENT therefore the article should be kept.[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] War Wounded (talk) 18:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • All of the coverage was published in October 2023, so there’s no WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Additionally, some of the sources are GENREL, such as Bol News. WP:109PAPERS — Saqib (talk I contribs) 21:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can these sources be evaluated?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I would say that this event passes WP:NEVENT therefore should be kept. Wikibear47 (talk) 14:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikibear47, Passes WP:NEVENT on what basis? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 21:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Source assessment table:

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow for discussion of source assessment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 20:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Passes WP:NEVENT. Disagreed with the nominator that article received coverage in only October 2023 as this [9] & this [10] are the coverage after October. 39.34.141.22 (talk) 10:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.