Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Explica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Plenty of refs here but none appear to convey any notability. They cover the founder and provide examples of what they do, and links to blogs (their own), mentions of their funding - but nothing that shows any independednt realiable notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   01:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete  A small new company, 1-10 employees.  Fails WP:SUSTAINED.  Unscintillating (talk) 05:16, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as clear advertising alone sourced by advertised PR. SwisterTwister talk 19:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.