Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exstreamer (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. No objections to deletion (or any commentary at all) after two relists. RL0919 (talk) 17:46, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Exstreamer

Exstreamer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two minor reviews (the ones in the external links section) are all I can find, likely fails WP:NPRODUCT. I'm an audiophile myself but I just don't see the notability here. SITH (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:48, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:48, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exstreamer (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.