Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ExtenZe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus to delete the article has emerged. Malinaccier (talk) 19:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ExtenZe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be a WP:PROMO article. There is a lack of reliable or independent sources that are not trivial. The contents of the article are (IMHO) not encyclopedic and have no other purpose than to advertise the product as "rarely having side effects" and listing the corporate endorsements it has. Nicnote^{say hello!}_contribs 11:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:15, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it appears that we're having a longer AfD discussion here. Wikipedia is not a product directory, and I don't think this is notable as a medical treatment. However, they have run a very large number of commercial advertisements in the United States. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. There is some coverage of the brand, ex. [1], [2], [3], [http://articles.latimes.com/2006/jul/25/local/me-extenze25. through this is borderline and most coverage seems to be critical (which is good since it would lessen the ad-like outlook of this). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:49, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.