Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faerschthaff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Faerschthaff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no notability whatsoever attached to this self-proclaimed "small Farmstead and Hamlet" created by a now-blocked user. Fails WP:GNG;WP:GEOLAND with considerable brio. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Luxembourg. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. BilletsMauves (talk) 15:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, appears to be literally a farm found on a map. CMD (talk) 16:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 00:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.