Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahrenheit Press

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fahrenheit Press (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two reliable sources have passing mention. Not passing WP:GNG Marvellous Spider-Man 09:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is a small publisher of sci-fi books which has only been founded last year. They certainly dont pass WP:NCORP by any means. The coverage of this company is basically limited to blogs and non RS, and even that is limited. The 2 non-blog sources in the article are just 2 interviews with the founder, source one doesn't even mention the company. Apart from that there is not really anything out there which resembles sufficient coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Since they are apparently focusing on digital distribution, I doubt there is anything more offline. I therefore think the article should be deleted due a lack of RS to satisfy WP:GNG. Dead Mary (talk) 15:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.