Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fall of Nazi Germany

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fall of Nazi Germany

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is amply covered in many WW2 articles, this appears to be a poor synthesis of things discussed in a few recent books. Oaktree b (talk) 00:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 06:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify I think there is a good article that could be created here, as presently Wikipedia's coverage on the collapse of the Third Reich is rather scant. Right now, though, this article seems to only duplicate material that exists elsewhere. I'd advise Fakescientist8000 maybe to create something more extensive in draftspace, one which draws upon a wide range of academic sources, and perhaps details the exact series of events the Reich went through, perhaps ending with the Potsdam Conference. — Czello ^(music) 07:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: unnecessary fork and redundant to Nazi Germany#Turning point and collapse. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- A poorly composed article on a subject where there will be multiple articles already. Possibly redirect to P199's target. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a newly-created content fork that doesn't improve on coverage of the topic. Walt Yoder (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.