Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FamousNiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FamousNiki

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A complete fail of WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, just one of many people/cats on the Internet doing things. SilverTiger12 (talk) 22:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SilverTiger12 (talk) 22:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Internet. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – BhagyaMani (talk) 07:33, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. // Timothy :: talk 23:56, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I believe I can responsibly say that the Yandex.Zen mentioned in the article is a clickbait dump whose verification really doesn't mean much. Furthermore, it's worth noting that the page was originally created by a single-purpose account (WP:SPA). Therefore, a COI in its creation cannot be ruled out, too. Suitskvarts (talk) 12:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.