Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farouk Jiwa (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Farouk Jiwa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography of non-notable person. Agree with first AfD by User:Boleyn. NPASR Widefox; talk 01:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete first AfD closed only because it didn't attact a single comment. Does not meet WP:NOTABILITY. It was created by an WP:SPA whose username is the Fjiwa, indicating possible self-promotion. It has been tagged for notability for almost seven years, so it is time it had a good discussion about its notability, and it is decidd one way or the other. I would ask any potential closers to give it a bit of extra time if it is not attracting comments. Boleyn (talk) 06:13, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Self-penned PR bio, making no substantive or properly sourced claim of notability that would pass any of our inclusion rules. This is so bad that if it were being created today, instead of eight years ago when our sourcing and inclusion standards were looser than Mama June Boo Boo's morals, I'd have speedied it on sight as a primary-sourced advertisement. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 08:20, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 12:04, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Subject does not appear to meet the notability guidelines. Egsan Bacon (talk) 19:41, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.