Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farswal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Farswal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that it's WP:NOTABLE. 1st AfD closed only because of lack of response - hopefully we can resolve this issue now. Boleyn (talk) 04:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only thing I can find about this is extremely similar text from another wiki, and it is referenced there, but equally terse. It clearly fails WP:GNG. As an aside, @Boleyn:, why not make a single AfD disussion for each of these articles, or use WP:PROD? FalconK (talk) 05:37, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Response' Falcon Kirtaran, I avoid using prod when sources are likely to be mainly in a language I can't read. As for bundling them, it's an idea, but a minority of these articles will (and have been) prove notable at AfD - I think judging them separately is fairest, especially as they are different and by many different creators. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 07:30, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per outcomes of other similar AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barhiya, etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.