Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fastwalkers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 02:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fastwalkers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No coverage of the "NORAD classification" in reliable sources. The documentary is sensationalist and not a reliable source. Masters thesis is unreliable per WP:SCHOLARSHIP. There is also this thesis, but again... Brycehughes (talk) 03:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The sources don't pass muster per WP:FRINGE, and general failure of GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: inadequate demonstration that it passes WP:GNG. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 22:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.