Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fateful Findings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT#1, nomination withdrawn and no votes for deletion. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone

Fateful Findings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 11:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. st170e^talk 21:10, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. st170e^talk 21:10, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's got a reputation as a cult film: [1] from The Plain Dealer, [2] from Twitch Film, [3] from Las Vegas Weekly, [4] from Deadline.com, [5] from The Dissolve, [6] from Nathan Rabin at Rotten Tomatoes, and [7] from The Stranger. I'm sure there's more besides this, too. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Added them to the article. There's still a lot more that could be said. This has been cited as an example of post-The Room so-bad-it's-good cinema. This really seems to have legs. There's sustained coverage from 2013 onward. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep per easily meeting the letter and intent of WP:NF even prior to it being thought non-notable by our well-intended nominator and pointed out here. Sorry BOVINEBOY, but multiple available sources existed for years, even if they were not used in the version you brought to AFD. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw Thanks! BOVINEBOY2008 12:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.