Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima Togbe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fatima Togbe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find any evidence of notability. While "founder of the first Nigerian Muslim high-fashion Magazine, Hayati" is a credible claim of significance, its not an evidence of notability] Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 11:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 11:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 11:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 11:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 11:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 06:07, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:57, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 04:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.. No better sources found. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Chrisw80 (talk) 05:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I looked everywhere and can't find coverage about her. I think it's a case of WP:TOOSOON. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.