Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Faux

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this page, being about a fairly commonplace word, has little room for expansion into a proper encyclopedia article. (Elevated from contested PROD) Ibadibam (talk) 17:21, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article's content has more to say about things with the word in it, and not about the actual word. ^My^name ^isnot^dave (talk/contribs) 17:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Keep this page should be merged with Faux (disambiguation), and the merged page should be at Faux. Power~enwiki (talk) 18:24, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and move Faux (disambiguation) here. The only appropriate info in the article is the definition, and that is not enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - belongs in Wiktionary. ^{Atsme📞📧} 00:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As above, belongs in Wiktionary. Deathlibrarian (talk) 09:24, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:30, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:31, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as dictdef. --Lockley (talk) 05:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.