Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fauzia Nasreen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fauzia Nasreen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 18:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Ambassadors may not be inherently notable, but they should be. This one has RS, and has held two ambassadorships and one other prominent position in Government. Wm335td (talk) 19:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It would be ridiculous if a bloke chosen by his city to play football (for the city) is notable whereas a woman chosen by her country to represent them and their country's future with foreign heads of state was not. Ambassadors should be notable without question. Victuallers (talk) 21:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Victuallers' rationale, Wm's source, and what WP:NPOL would say if I had my druthers. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: There are other RS on ProQuest, including this one: "Int'l Community must force India to talk on Kashmir dispute: Fauzia Nasreen" (The Balochistan Times, 2017). — Toughpigs (talk) 02:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Ambassadors are notable. They represent their country. Lefcentreright ^{Talk | Contribs | Global} 10:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. Meets WP:DIPLOMAT. Mar4d (talk) 03:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.