Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fearscape

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. There is no clear consensus on whether the subject is notable or not. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 02:07, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fearscape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found two RSes, and one is a brief mention in a larger work and the other is a review of their album. Other sources I found did not support notability. https://books.google.ca/books?id=QK3JCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA2109&lpg=PA2109&dq=%22Fearscape%22+Australia&source=bl&ots=YZEGW9DDEK&sig=L44M_QOMkAtGTm3-A3-6uw1x5ZY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiXgOXtwrXMAhVJ02MKHakZCpc4ChDoAQhGMAk#v=onepage&q=%22Fearscape%22%20Australia&f=false http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/fearscape-complete-work-on-debut-album/ So the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO as far as I can see. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Not sure yet (though it doesn't look good as it stands), but there's also a pile of linked articles that are uncited and have questionable noteworthiness - David Gerard (talk) 09:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no indication of meeting WP:MUSIC. No significant coverage in reliable sources. A passing mention in the Irish Times is the best I found. Huon (talk) 18:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I've found three reviews; they released two studio albums; they toured Australia; I don't know if they're still extant but there's sufficient material for notability per WP:NBAND#1.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Draft instead for now as three reviews may be better and I may almost be convinced, but the overall article is still also questionable. Draft and wait for better. SwisterTwister talk 05:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. The coverage in Encyclopaedia of Australian Heavy Metal certainly goes beyond 'brief mention' ([1]), but most of the other coverage seems to be in amateur webzines. --Michig (talk) 06:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.