Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fener Ada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fener Ada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hard to search as there is at least one other island with the same name. Tagged many years ago as uncited. The cite on the Turkish article is poor https://www.getamap.net/maps/turkey/izmir/_fener_adasi/ Chidgk1 (talk) 06:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 06:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:25, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NATFEAT. "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. [...] If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. For example, a river island with no information available except name and location should probably be described in an article on the river". Do not redirect since there are multiple islets of the same name. Geschichte (talk) 11:59, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I think that the consensus has developed that even geographical locations need to have some references. Bearian (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.