Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feras Bugnah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f e minist 15:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feras Bugnah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lack of coverage to prove notability, unremarkable YouTube personality Mjbmr (talk) 16:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 16:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 16:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Easily passes WP:GNG, per these sources: [1] [2] [3] [4]. These are the main english language sources, and include the New York Times. Seeing as this guy is from Saudi Arabia, there could be many more sources in arabic, infact at a first look there seems to be, 6 pages on google news of articles that show his name in arabic: [5]. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 16:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nominator has failed to do their BEFORE. Clear passage of the GNG. Fox, Arab News, NYT etc. From 2011, 13, 14, 15, so it passes SUSTAINED. I suggest this be closed as SNOW keep. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 18:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 18:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- notable as a social activist rather than a YouTuber; see for example: On Saudi Arabia: Its People, Past, Religion, Fault Lines--and Future by Karen Elliott House. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sourced, notable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.