Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fern Deacon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fern Deacon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the requirements of WP:NACTOR or WP:BIO as no reliable sources directly discuss her roles. SmartSE (talk) 17:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: It's true that there won't be a lot of press discussing the actress's performance, as she's terribly young. She did play in the Showtime series Penny Dreadful as "Young Mina," and she has UK television appearances (IMDB profile was not easy to find: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4313039/). There is no reason to believe that the upcoming appearances won't be true. So, Wikipedia is not IMDB, so the question is only whether this level of consistent work and exposure is a warrant for eventual (or unfound) third party reference or not? I think so, but weakly. Hithladaeus (talk) 19:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All the sources do show she did these things, but they don't show why she's notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Also, she's young isn't a good argument, and probably shows it's also a case of WP:TOOSOON. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as my searches and IMDb show there's not much and only News found passing mentions, I would've suggested moving elsewhere but with only three episodes each for the two shows, that's not much weight for a move. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Majorly WP:TOOSOON. Also remember, that Wikipedia has a duty to protect minors from coverage that is disproportional to their notability. Le petit fromage (talk) 14:04, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.