Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fetch.AI

Fetch.AI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no sources and previous content was filled with non RS and self published sources and was partially written by someone who was paid for it.

As it currently stands, the article would need to be blanked in order to meet verifiability standards. Laura240406 (talk) 09:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can also see that similar articles about the company and CEO have been deleted on the simple Wikipedia:

simple:User_talk:桑斯春德 simple:User talk:Namaste8907

The site has also been deleted over there. Laura240406 (talk) 10:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Websites, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I also cannot find any reliable sources. Most are self-published or come from crypto sites, though I'm not sure if that fetch.ai is the same as this company. I don't think fetch is going to happen here.

  Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 11:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

:Keep - This Page has highjacked, now I have reverted to to normal.

Kindly removed the deletion now User:Laura240406.

Kinldy check Fetch.AI . U678 (talk) 06:42, 3 May 2025 (UTC)(Blocked sockpuppet) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:27, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Lacking secondary sources. Brandon (talk) 07:01, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the article was hijacked as stated by U678 and the old one seems "good enough" (has secondary sources) Laura240406 (talk) 08:00, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]