Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fetla's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fetla's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, poorly written. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Unable to find any significant reference beyond local news involving renovations, reinvestment, etc. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 02:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Lack of sources and fails WP:GNG. Can't even verify it is even a shopping mall. Ajf773 (talk) 02:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• DELETE This is not a notable gun shop. Fails WP:GNG.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:51, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.