Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FiREapps
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 17:22, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
FiREapps
- FiREapps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. Refs provided show that it exists, where it is located (?!) and that the business it trades in is BIG business - but nothing to establish notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 17:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:29, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:30, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No depth of coverage, all the sources say they exist but nothing else. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- (Note: If kept, this page should be moved to Fireapps, as Wikipedia does not stylise article titles) Joseph2302 (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Unfortunately delete for now and draft/userfy as although the article is neat and sourced, my further searches found nothing good aside from this, this and this. There's also no good move target. SwisterTwister talk 05:08, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.