Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FindSALT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. There has been little discussion and the overall arguments to keep and delete more or less cancel each other out. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 08:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FindSALT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose the deletion of the FindSALT Wikipedia page due to its lack of notability, as it relies on limited sources that do not provide substantial independent coverage or establish its significance within the restaurant industry. Mapsama (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and United Arab Emirates. Shellwood (talk) 13:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Lean Keep I lean toward keeping this article. There is independent coverage in gulf news and Conde Nast traveler. The fact that someone had to clarify that the restaurant in london is not from UAE also suggests notability to me.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural keep LLM'ed/boilerplate rationale without one original word from the nominator themselves. Nathannah • 📮 12:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep there is an extensive media coverage in the Arab Middle-east newspapers. Norlk (talk) 13:08, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete We need to see sources, not vague comments on how they exist. Where? How can I find them? I haven't turned up anything useful. Because this is a company (commercial enterprise) then GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Is any of the "Keep" !voters find some good references, ping me and I'll check them out. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @HighKing Would [1] [2] and [3] from the article count? Based on those three, I lean towards keeping this. It should probably be moved to just "SALT" though. Toadspike [Talk] 06:42, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.