Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finding and Preserving Mutuke People Cultural Identity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 10:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Finding and Preserving Mutuke People Cultural Identity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous proposed deletions have been avoided by moving the topic from Mutuke Clan and Preserving Mutuke People Cultural Identity.

As I previously stated on Mutuke Clan, none of the sources mention the existence of a Mutuke people and I cannot find any information on the subject. The only thing resembling this is a personal website by the page author which clearly identifies this as his family surname (not an historical people). SFB 22:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find anything to show that there is actually a clan by this name. The only thing I could even find that used this name was this book, but without the entire book I can't say if this is referring to a clan or just a family- it's far from being a reliable source in this context. I can't really find anything to show that this clan exists. If it does exist, it looks like it's a fairly non-notable clan since nobody has covered it in any context and if it does exist, is probably lumped in with peoples from the surrounding area. I have a suspicion that this will likely need to be salted at some point, given that this has been created under a few different names and there have been attempts to make multiple pages for this group. I've redirected at least one of them to the article, but there may be more. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At best, original research. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.