Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fingazz (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fingazz

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable music entrepreneur. Sources are all un-RS, discogs and the like. Nothing found in RS, appears PROMO. Was also deleted way back in 2017, for lack of sourcing, same as this nom. Oaktree b (talk) 02:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 02:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Most of the sources are unreliable. Fails WP:GNG. US-Verified (talk) 02:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not seeing coverage necessary to meet WP:BIO or WP:NMUSIC. SmartSE (talk) 20:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.