Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire and Spice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. While there are only a few flakes of snow here, it's fairly clear that the notability just isn't here and waiting out the remaining days would only bring the same result. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fire and Spice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This book does not meet notability criteria. There is very little third-party coverage and the article was created by a user found to be a sockpuppet. Manzarene (talk) 12:42, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Strong Delete under G11; no established WP:N and created by a known spammer. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 12:57, 14 July 2018 (UTC) Edit: After reviewing G11, I would agree it's not G11 material, but it still should be deleted. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 02:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:G11. Delete. Not notable. Absolutely no reliable sources. Just look at the author's entry (User:Westripwow) in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WilliamMartin91/Archive to confirm intent. Newslinger (talk) 13:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable author and no significant coverage of the book itself. Note: Speedy deletion criterion G11 does not apply since the text of the article is clearly neutral in tone. Regards SoWhy 16:59, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:50, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.