Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiskerton Phantom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JGHowes ^talk 03:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fiskerton Phantom

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage beyond fringe sources. Sole source appears to be attributed to the Daily Star which is described as "less reliable than the Daily Mail" at Perennial Sources. –dlthewave ☎ 22:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:05, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of reliable sources. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 09:52, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: sourcing is in passing and / or fringe. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:26, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not seeing any notability.Slatersteven (talk) 14:58, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of reliable sources. :bloodofox: (talk) 19:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.