Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlannelJax's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FlannelJax's

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company fails WP:CORP. Dewritech (talk) 19:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As I noted when I proposed it for deletion: No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Citations provided are to the company's own site, franchise directories, PR pieces, local news, etc. but nothing that talks about it in a significant way. Google search for the name comes up with fewer than 70 results (either as FlannelJax's or Flannel Jax's). ... discospinster _talk 20:09, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, obviously just promotional - David Gerard (talk) 12:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Discospinster. The article clearly fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP, and WP:PROMO. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:48, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.