Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flatsound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flatsound

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article just looking at it does seem nice and everything. Until you look further and you notice no sources at all other then the official website on the infobox (which prevented me from doing a BLP prod), anyway singer with questionable notability. The albums seem questionable also-maybe those should be redirects to the artist if this article survives. Wgolf (talk) 17:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. I was a bit mystified about what this was doing on my watchlist but then I realised that it must date back to one of the last two times this was deleted. This is a small walled garden of almost orphaned articles. I see no evidence that this guy has a record deal. In fact, I see no evidence that anybody ever pressed a CD with him as the sole artist. Yes, there are MP3s on sale on Amazon, and he did once have a split CD with somebody else, but that is not good enough. Allmusic never heard of him. No charts. No press. In short: No good. He ain't no Flat Eric. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DanielRigal:-so think the albums should be edited into redirects right now or done into prods instead? Wgolf (talk) 18:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. Either PROD them or maybe leave them while the AfD runs and then, if this gets deleted, they become speedyable due to the artist not having an article. Either way, I think it will all be the same in a week's time. I wouldn't turn them into redirects yet, in case anybody thinks they are relevant to deciding the question here. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed-also they probably will be deleted next Saturday anyway. Wgolf (talk) 18:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. | Uncle Milty | talk | 20:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing suggesting solid independent notability, clearly no sources either. SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.