Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flick Shagwell (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 00:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flick Shagwell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Pornbio and gng. Scene awards no longer count. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO with only scene-related award wins. Appearing in an award-winning feature is not enough to satisfy PORNBIO criterion #2. Fails WP:GNG with only passing mentions by reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the accurate assessments by the nom and by Gene93k. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:11, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.