Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flo Technologies Inc
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Flo Technologies Inc
- Flo Technologies Inc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A startup that doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The CNET reference is marginal, everything else is worse for the purpose of notability. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:59, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. If this does wind up being kept, we will also have to address promotional language in the article. Tazerdadog (talk) 00:36, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, none of the sources look are any good, even the CNET one is mostly repeating the claims of the company, not testing it etc Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:41, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 15:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per failing ncorp. not supported in depth by sources and mildly advertorial. Quek157 (talk) 11:51, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.