Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flukysnap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flukysnap

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet our notability guidelines set out at Wikipedia:Notability (web). Whilst the article claims this to be "one of the biggest picture and video platforms in the world" this claim does not seem to be substantiated at all. Alexa puts it at the 4,011,554 most popular website. I can find no significant coverage in any reliable sources. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 08:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 10:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong (speedy?) delete. An article on another website by the same creator, JustEntertainmnt, was already speedy deleted. This article could probably go the same route. I certainly don't see anything that shows this site is notable enough to keep an article on. —C.Fred (talk) 20:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. --Fixuture (talk) 22:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as still questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.