Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fongo-Tongo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Proposal without a meaningful rationale; legally recognized populated places are inherently notable (non-admin closure) Dronebogus (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fongo-Tongo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't meet Wikipedia Policy Endrabcwizart (talk) 19:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cameroon-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 February 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – French wp article demonstrates WP:POTENTIAL.
• Keep – Legally recognized populated places are considered notable under WP:GNG, and I don't see any evidence that Fongo-Tongo isn't one. BangJan1999 21:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.