Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreverlin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Don't usually close on 2 but after being up 3 weeks I honestly can't see this AFD gaining any new !votes so may aswell wrap it up now, Overall consensus is to keep (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:45, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foreverlin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find sufficient coverage for this to pass WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: This clearly passes GNG, for its reviews for their first studio album in HM Magazine and Indie Vision Music, along with reviews for their second studio album in New Release Today, Indie Vision Music, and Alpha Omega News. They satisfy BAND per No. 1 because the aforementioned reviews, and No. 2 for they have charted two songs on the Billboard magazine Christian Rock charts, where this shows and proves, "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart."The Cross Bearer (talk) 03:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as this seems acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 02:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.