Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frère-Bourgeois

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 05:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Frère-Bourgeois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested on the grounds that a Book search shows clear notability, but what I see is listings indicating it exists and other directory style listings. There is coverage around Albert Frère and its constituents, but I can find no evidence of significant, in depth coverage of the holding company. StarM 20:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. StarM 20:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. StarM 20:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. StarM 20:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. StarM 20:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, Google Books Results only lists the company, for notability there need to be significant coverage which is clearly not present. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NCORP - holding and shell companies are not automatically notable, and nothing about this shows its importance. Bearian (talk) 18:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.