Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franco Marx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Franco Marx

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local councillors are not presumptively notable under WP:NPOL, and my WP:BEFORE search found no significant coverage sufficient for Marx to pass the GNG. (NPP action) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hyper-local politician fails WP:NPOL. KidAd • SPEAK 00:42, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NPOL. Bondegezou (talk) 11:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, no reliable references present. Timetraveller80 (talk) 16:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete members of legislttive councils below the 1st level sub-division in a federal government need really good sources, This person is on the legislature of a 3rd level subdivision, so not even remotely close to meeting notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:09, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Municipal ward councillors are not "inherently" notable under WP:NPOL, and this article is referenced nowhere close to enough to actually get him over the inclusion criteria for local politicians. Bearcat (talk) 17:12, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable and minimal citations. Gusfriend (talk) 06:43, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.