Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frequent stops

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 23:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frequent stops

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film that seems poorly translated Epicgenius (talk) 20:05, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note. After nomination, article was retitled Paradas contínuas. —C.Fred (talk) 21:37, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Which is the actual name of the film. The problem was that someone used Google Translate on the article on es.wiki, and translated everything, including things that shouldn't have been translated, like the title of the film, the names of songs, the names of musical groups, etc.
  As for the nomination, I don't have an opinion about whether it's notable or not, but "poorly translated" is not a criteria for deletion, it's a criteria for improving the article, which I have done to the extent that I can. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:45, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty of press coverage on GNews. Easily passes WP:GNG. Pburka (talk) 22:58, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per lack of WP:BEFORE and per numerous sources available for improvement (thanks Pburka). Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per Pburka. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.